Woh-whoa, listen to the music

The enjoyment of music is universal, but the ways we have listened to it have evolved considerably over the years.

cropped-IMG_1992-Edit-Edit-e1441159521340Our parents/grandparents gathered around the living room radio (the “wireless”) or played 78s on the Victrola.  Music lovers in the ’50s put dimes in the jukebox and turned up their transistor radios.  By the ’60s, vintage-jukebox-25481107_2048x2048we still listened incessantly to the car radio and played our stacks of 45s, but we also started buying albums and ever more sophisticated sound systems, including headphones, to listen to our tunes.

As the 1970s dawned, another huge development occurred that changed everything:  Tapes.

432ad570-2007-11e7-b057-e54777097c6d-500At first, there were reel-to-reel tape machines, debuting in the early ’60s, which were pretty much the exclusive domain of audiophiles with deep pockets.  They were expensive and cumbersome.  You had to fit the big 7″ magnetic tape reels onto spools and feed them past the recording and playback heads.  You had to know at least a little bit about setting recording levels, and functions like “rewind” and “fast-forward,” which was way too technical for most people, who left such matters to the nerds in the AV department.  But the sound quality (assuming you were using high-quality recording tape) was very good, perhaps as good as the LPs then available.  But the market that was interested and affluent enough to invest in this option was a very small niche, largely because (and this is crucial) it wasn’t portable.

519AEVWPHVLThen the cassette tape arrived, which provided the crucial elements of convenience and portability, but the sound quality was pathetic.  If you were listening to spoken dialog or nursery rhymes, the cassette adequately served its purpose, and consequently, it was more often used for dictation or as a children’s diversion.  But for teens and adults eager to listen to their favorite music, it was simply not an acceptable option — yet.

EP-150329174Enter the notorious 8-track tape.  The sound quality on these boxy contraptions wasn’t up to the standards of reel-to-reel (or albums), but it was a significant improvement over cassettes.  Most important, they too were portable, and in a culture where people spent more and more time in their cars, this was a very big deal.  You could still tune in to disc jockeys broadcasting songs on the radio, but now, instead, you could control what you were listening to.  For a while, the 8-track tape was hugely popular, and every pickup truck and hot rod on every highway and back road across the country came equipped with an 8-track tape player, first installed as an aftermarket accessory and eventually included in-dash by the auto manufacturers.

A-primo-selectionBut 8-tracks had a glaringly frustrating limitation.  They were designed with four “programs” which divided the tape’s bandwidth into four sections, and the songs were arranged on those four sections in whatever order fit best.  This occasionally required the recording labels to alter the order of the songs from the order found on the album, which messed with the artist’s original creative intent.  Sometimes you’d have to endure this scenario:  A longer track (and there were plenty that ran as long as 12-15 minutes or more) wouldn’t fit on one program, so it would fade out halfway through, the machine would take as long as 30 seconds to switch to the next program, and the song would then fade back in for its W3ybX-1460401580-3240-list_items-8track_beatlesconclusion.  It was incredibly annoying, and there was nothing you could do about it.  And there was another problem:  At home on your record player, you could lift the needle and repeat a favorite song or skip crummy tracks at will, but 8-track players had no rewind or fast-forward functions and offered no such flexibility.  Listeners were essentially prisoners.

A white knight named Thomas Dolby arrived with his Dolby Noise Reduction System, jhhvkjqeihmqoxczfvbkwhich removed or sharply reduced the annoying hiss inherent in early cassette tape sound reproduction technology.  This invention, and the introduction of longer-lasting, higher-quality chromium dioxide tape, made cassettes a far more attractive alternative — the convenience and portability of an 8-track with the sound quality approaching that of a reel-to-reel (not to mention its rewind and fast-forward functions).  Cassette tape players soon became key components in home stereo systems and the default systems in cars as well, and cassettes eventually rivaled albums at the checkout line.

But the most critical development was the debut of blank tape and cassette decks that not only played music but recorded it.  Consumers could now not only copy their album collections onto blank cassettes for playback in the car, they could compile their own il_340x270.1231233051_70gwmixed tapes of songs from various sources.  We could now become de facto disc jockeys ourselves, playing pre-recorded collections of the best songs from our favorite albums, or our friends’  borrowed albums.  It was like listening to our own personal radio station with no commercials or chatter, and we got to pick the songs.

Among my circle of friends, I had a reputation as a music lover with an enviable collection and a talent for assembling some excellent mixed tapes, if I do say so myself.  It was a labor of love, selecting the right combination of songs.  I would listen as I worked, trying to come up with the perfect segue from one song to the next.  Sometimes, I would start taping a song and then decide, no, that one didn’t quite mesh as well as I thought it would, so I’d go back and record a different, better song over it.  Working with tapes gave me that kind of flexibility.

I’m proud to say my “Hack Tapes” were in high demand at parties, they were frequently borrowed for long road trips, and they were even duplicated if someone owned a “dubbing deck” to make taped copies of tapes.

64a39c41e3cbaf61a22a0e03b8794082--mixtape-cassetteIt was an entirely new arena to express creativity.  A mixed tape might contain an exhilarating potpourri of styles, much like the Top 40 playlists of that era might include back-to-back samples of Motown, bubblegum, psychedelia, country, rockabilly and British blues.  Or it could feature a concentrated focus on one style — say, ’50s oldies for use at an Elvis revival, or ’70s progressive rock for your next stoner gathering, or reggae and surf music for a pool party.   You could also assemble your favorite band’s best songs (and not just the pre-determined “greatest hits”) in a playing order that suited your individual tastes.

I was fond of making “theme tapes” that brought together songs that shared a common element.  For example:

“Rock Around the World” included songs with cities or countries in the title (“Carolina In My Mind” by James Taylor, “I Go to Rio” by Pablo Cruise, “London Calling” by The Clash, “The Only Living Boy in New York” by Simon and Garfunkel).

“On the Road Again” featured tunes about cars and driving (“Little Deuce Coupe” by The Beach Boys, “Rockin’ Down the Highway” by The Doobie Brothers, “Thunder Road” by Bruce Springsteen, “Little Red Corvette” by Prince).

“Catch That Buzz” focused on numbers about drinking and partying (“One Scotch, One Bourbon, One Beer” by George Thorogood, “Tequila” by The Champs, “Margaritaville” by Jimmy Buffett, “Shanty” by Jonathan Edwards)

“Wake Up Tape” had songs with “Morning” in the title (“Chelsea Morning” by Joni Mitchell, “Morning Has Broken” by Cat Stevens, “One Fine Morning” by Lighthouse, “Good Morning Good Morning” by The Beatles).

“Stormy Weather” included tracks about rain (“Let It Rain” by Eric Clapton, “Riders on the Storm” by The Doors, “Walk Between Raindrops” by Donald Fagen, “Early Morning Rain” by Gordon Lightfoot).

22500567_278737079282092_6255214460365963264_nFor the altruist, the mixed tape also offered a perfect opportunity to compile the favorite songs of a friend or loved one and wrap it up as a very personal kind of birthday present.  For many Christmases, I gave my sister “Best Of” collections of songs from 30 or 40 years earlier (“Best of 1969” in 1999, etc.), which are not only fun for her to listen to, but fun for me to make.  One day a friend and I had a wonderfully spirited discussion about what might have happened if The Beatles had stayed together another year or two longer, and all the early solo hits were merged into one great final Beatles album.  Two days later, I handed him a copy of my new mix, “The Lost Beatles Album,” which included everything from “My Sweet Lord” and “Imagine” and “It Don’t Come Easy” to deep tracks like “Let It Roll,” “The Back Seat of My Car” and “Working Class Hero.”  I cherished the creative process as well as the finished product.

98c779cd203a8e67f6f267f576e6108fThe point is, blank cassettes gave you a freedom, previously unattainable, to listen to what you wanted when you wanted where you wanted.  It was a music lover’s utopia, made even better in the early ’80s with the debut of the Sony Walkman and the “boom box,” which broadened the “where” horizons even further.

With the advent of the compact disc in the ’80s (or more accurately, the recordable blank CD in the ’90s), the mixed 0007241470_10collection could now be assembled on CD as well.  And these days, since the arrival of iTunes libraries and digital downloads, assembling a CD mix can be accomplished in a fraction of the time just by clicking on 15-20 files and then walking away.  But I’m something of a dinosaur who clings to the old way of doing things, and I can’t help but be saddened by this “improvement.”  The process seems to be more practical and less emotional, more lazy and less personally committed.  Sure, it’s more convenient — you can even just hit “shuffle” and have your songs played back in random order.  But there’s no heart and soul in that.  The creativity required to compile a truly memorable mixed tape/CD — coming up with an appropriate theme, just the right order, the perfect segue — seems to be mostly lost these days.

I still have (in storage) the cassettes I made between 1975 and 2005, and although I don’t play them because I no longer have a tape player in my car or my home, I’ve converted many of them to CD format, and I play those all the time.  And I still make CD mixes now and then, and I put a lot of thought into them as I build them.  So there’s hope that the Technics_Turntable-by_David_Gallardold ways may yet have life, if the rebirth of vinyl and turntables among the hardcore audiophiles is any indication.  Once disparaged as “old school,” LPs are now recognized as the gold standard for their superior audio quality.  As they say, everything truly great, given time, comes back into fashion eventually.

I still chuckle and get a twinkle in my eye when someone asks me, “Hey Hack, can you make me a mix for Christmas?”

Make tonight a wonderful thing

Periodically, I plan to use this space to pay homage to artists who I believe are worthy of focused attention — artists with an extraordinary, consistently excellent body of work.  Some are commercial superstars; others have slipped under the radar of many readers.  Most will be somewhere in between those extremes.  

In this essay, I look at the curious assemblage known as Steely Dan.

* * *

A lot of popular music — perhaps too much of itimages — is predictable.  For more than half a century, radio play has typically gone to the songs and artists that cater to the masses.  Safe, accessible, painless to interpret and assimilate.  Not that there’s anything inherently wrong with that.  But like many music aficionados, I tend to prefer art that somehow pushes the boundaries, explores the unusual, juxtaposes disparate elements, and yet wraps it in an aurally pleasing manner that’s memorable and gratifying.

In a nutshell, that describes the repertoire of Steely Dan, one of the strangest, most musically intelligent, lyrically cryptic “bands” to emerge from the fertile late ’60s/early ’70s period.

I put the word “band” in quotation marks because, for the most, part, Steely Dan wasn’t a band at all.  It was two men — Donald Fagen and Walter Becker — who wrote the music and lyrics, arranged the material, hired multiple session musicians to realize their visions and, in general, refused to play the rock music celebrity game even as they successfully navigated its waters.

Between their mind-blowing first LP in 1972 until their final album in 1980, (although they re-emerged two decades later), Fagen and Becker cranked out seven LPs of uncommonly fascinating and engaging music that defined the Seventies every bit as much as The Eagles, or Springsteen, or The Bee Gees, or The Clash, or Fleetwood Mac.  I would submit that, among those bands competing for fans’ entertainment dollars during that time, Steely Dan gave listeners more bang for their buck than any of them.

Perhaps what made Steely Dan’s music so much more intriguing than most was the fact that Fagen and Becker were both deeply rooted in a love for the jazz of Davis, Monk, Parker and Brubeck, and crucially, they knew how to couch those enigmatic chord progressions in catchy, pop-oriented structures that proved irresistible to most mainstream audiences.

Not everybody dug their stuff.   Critics who preferred the chaos of punk, the bombast of arena rock or the mindless exuberance of disco vilified them for what they saw as overly slick production values and lame cocktail-lounge arrangements on their later releases.  But if sales numbers have any significance, the fact that their discography includes eight platinum-selling albums and nine Top 20 singles, and they still play to huge crowds on tour today, means their legacy endures very handsomely.

Raised in the 1950s-era New Jersey suburbs, Fagen and Becker met as students at Bard College outside New York City, where they developed a taste for offbeat literature and an amalgam of jazz-blues-pop-funk musical leanings.  They aspired to be songwriters, first and foremost, and headed to the Brill Building milieu during its dying days to peddle their wares to music publishers there.  But their songs, particularly their lyrics, were too foreign, too weird, too cryptic, for pop singers to wrap their heads around.

Eventually they concluded they needed to abandon the old-fashioned East Coast for the vibrant new recording studios of Los Angeles, and form their own band to record the songs themselves.  They found a sympathetic producer, signed with a maverick label and recruited two crack session guitarists, Denny Dias and Jeff “Skunk” Baxter,” and a drummer.  With Fagen on keyboards and Becker on bass, they took 10 songs from the library of material they’d come up with and crafted a phenomenal debut, “Can’t Buy a Thrill,” which included the samba-influenced “Do It Again,” the classic rock staple, “Reelin’ in the Years,” and incredibly catchy tunes like “Kings,” “Change of the Guard” and “Only a Fool Would Say That,” all featuring Fagen’s unmistakable sneering vocal style.  The fact that the band was notoriously named for a Japanese sex toy didn’t seem to matter.  They were off and running.

And yet, almost right away, something was different.  Fagen and Becker hated touring, and they fought relentlessly with the record label to avoid going on the road.  Much like The Beatles in their later years, Fagen and Becker preferred the insular environment of the studio, where they could hone, polish, and finesse their unique music using a broad array of talented instrumentalists and singers to make the tracks truly shine.  So the “band,” such as it was, broke up after a couple of brief, unsatisfying tours, and the songwriting wizards concentrated on their recordings instead.

And what spectacular recordings they were.  1973’s “Countdown to Ecstasy” was perhaps their jazziest, with complex arrangements and lengthier solos, and another batch of great compositions — the bluesy “Bodhisattva,” the wistful “Pearl of the Quarter,” the infectious “My Old School,” the apocalyptic “King of the World.”  Many regard it as the finest Steely Dan album despite its lack of a hit single or much commercial success.

“Pretzel Logic” (1974), “Katy Lied” (1975) and “The Royal Scam” (1976) continued the duo’s impressive musical abilities, offering concise nuggets of intelligent pop rock that delved further into unique chord patterns and rhythms that are hard to resist even forty years later:  “Night by Night,” “Parker’s Band,” “Black Friday,” “Rose Darling,” “Don’t Take Me Alive,” “Haitian Divorce.”  The list of session musicians grew, and their performances added substantial depth and nuance.  Jazz guitarist Larry Carlton offered vital, tasteful solos that rivaled anything from the rock guitar gods of the era; future Doobie Brother crooner Michael McDonald pitched in with some delicious harmonies to augment Fagen’s ever-stronger lead vocals.

Their lyrics were among the most literate, cryptic words in all of rock music.  Fagen and Becker used wonderfully descriptive phrases to paint their aural pictures, but their ultimate meaning remained open to all kinds of interpretations.  The songwriters took mischievous pleasure in the lyrics’ inside jokes and cynical black comedy, and have remained notoriously silent about them over the years.  Recently, Fagen has offered a few tantalizing hints of explanation.  For instance, he says, “Ain’t never gonna do it without the fez on” refers to refraining from sex without a condom.  “Tonight when I chase the dragon” is slang for snorting Chinese heroin.  “Turn up the Eagles, the neighbors are listening” is a way to hide the sounds of domestic abuse.

Steely Dan songs take place in real locales — Scarsdale, Sunset Boulevard, Rudy’s, Barrytown, Camarillo, Annandale, Santa Ana, Vegas, Altimira, Mr. Chow’s, Rio Grande, New Orleans.  They are inhabited by a cast of increasingly bizarre characters — drug addicts (Charlie Freak), pathetic losers, sketchy physicians (Doctor Wu), sweet-hearted hookers, vengeful gamblers, desperate dealers (Kid Charlemagne), suicidal bankers, murderers on the run, angry wife-beaters, creepy pedophiles (Cousin Dupree).  And yet they’re somehow made palatable by being showcased against effervescent, upbeat melodies and danceable tempos.

The Dan’s popularity peaked in 1977 with “Aja” and its triumvirate of radio-friendly tracks, “Peg,” “Deacon Blues” and “Josie.”  By now, the sonic perfection was simply astonishing, and the number of musicians had grown to more than 20 — six different guitarists, six drummers, six keyboard players, five singers, two saxophonists — on only seven songs.  For a while there, it was one of those albums you heard everywhere you went, and often became the “go to” music played through concert sound systems during the break between warm-up act and headliner.

As with so many bands, personal and professional issues eventually stymied Fagen and Becker over the next three years as they worked on “Aja”‘s successor, “Gaucho,” which turned out to be their last album for two decades.  It, too, shone with unparalleled production values, utilized more than two dozen musicians, and included two hit singles, “Hey Nineteen” and “Time Out of Mind.”  But the duo was burned out and soon parted ways.  Becker moved to Hawaii with his family and concentrated on producing other artists, while Fagen poured his heart and soul into an excellent solo record, 1982’s “The Night Fly,” which sounded to most people like another Steely Dan product, although the lyrics told a more personal story revolving around key events in Fagen’s childhood.  (The hit single “I.G.Y.” referred to the International Geophysical Year of 1957, when scientific breakthroughs seemed to be happening on a weekly basis.)

Fagen and Becker then both dropped out of sight for more than ten years, preferring to shun the limelight even more than they had as hit songwriters.  Because of the duo’s apparent estrangement at the time and overall reluctance to ever perform concerts, most people were stunned in the late ’90s when Fagen and Becker announced not only a lengthy tour but plans for a new Steely Dan album as well.  Fans were delighted to finally hear the old songs in a live setting, and critics gushed at how great they sounded after such a long layoff, with the best seasoned musicians and singers along for the show, as you might expect.

The subsequent LP, the aptly titled “Two Against Nature,” was admittedly not up to par with the ’70s albums, but still included a few superb tracks like “Jack of Speed,” “Almost Gothic” and the single, “Cousin Dupree.”  Defying all odds, it grabbed not only a nomination but a win in the Album of the Year category at the 2001 Grammys, and Steely Dan was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame that same year in their fifth year of eligibility.  Another Steely Dan album “Everything Must Go,” followed in 2003, which, like its predecessor, was missing the memorable melodies that once made their albums so vital.  Still, there were a few vintage-sounding tracks like “The Last Mall,” “Godwhacker” and “Green Book.”

These two releases really don’t measure up to the excellence of their earlier work, and there’s been nothing new in the past 12 years.  But no matter.  Their impressive recorded history will always be there for our lasting enjoyment, and the duo are back on tour once again, and I’m eagerly awaiting their scheduled appearance at the Hollywood Bowl this summer.

Casual Steely Dan fans who know only the ’70s radio hits, and the generation or two of newer music lovers who might be unfamiliar with them, would be wise to do themselves the favor of digging deep into the rich repertoire of the Dan catalog.  I can safely say you will not be disappointed.

*****************************